Indications

Full Prescribing Information

Next Page Icon

Medication Guide

Next Page Icon

1L Advanced RCC

Combining familiar aRCC agents1,2

With 4-year minimum follow-up data3*

*Based on extended follow-up analysis at a minimum follow-up time of 48.1 months.3
Based on primary analysis at a median follow-up time of 18.1 months (range: 10.6–30.6 months).4

1L=first-line; aRCC=advanced renal cell carcinoma; I-O=immuno-oncology; TKI=tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

OPDIVO® (nivolumab) + CABOMETYX® (cabozantinib) logo with PFS, ORR, and OS icons

INDICATION OPDIVO® (nivolumab), in combination with cabozantinib, is indicated for the first-line treatment of adult patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

CHECKMATE 9ER: 1L ADVANCED RCC

FOR PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED aRCC PATIENTS

Efficacy across 3 key endpoints vs sunitinib1,3,4*

PRIMARY ANALYSIS RESULTS (MEDIAN FOLLOW-UP TIME OF 18.1 MONTHS; RANGE: 10.6–30.6 MONTHS)4

Progression-free survival: Primary endpoint1,4*

  • mPFS: 16.6 months (95% CI: 12.5–24.9) with OPDIVO® (nivolumab) + CABOMETYX® (cabozantinib) vs 8.3 months (95% CI: 7.0–9.7) with sunitinib (HR=0.51; 95% CI: 0.41–0.64; P<0.0001)1,4

Overall response rate: Secondary endpoint1,4*

  • ORR: 55.7% (n=180/323 [95% CI: 50.1–61.2]) with OPDIVO + CABOMETYX vs 27.1% (n=89/328 [95% CI: 22.4–32.3]) with sunitinib (P<0.0001)1
    • 8% (n=26/323) CR and 48% (n=154/323) PR for OPDIVO + CABOMETYX vs 4.6% (n=15/328) CR and 23% (n=74/328) PR for sunitinib1,4

Overall survival: Secondary endpoint1,4*

  • mOS: NR (95% CI: NR) with OPDIVO + CABOMETYX and NR (95% CI: 22.6–NR) with sunitinib (HR=0.60; 98.89% CI: 0.40–0.89; P=0.0010)1,4
EXTENDED FOLLOW-UP ANALYSIS RESULTS (MINIMUM FOLLOW-UP TIME OF 48.1 MONTHS)3:

Extended follow-up summary:

Progression-free survival

  • mPFS†‡: 16.4 months (95% CI: 12.5–19.3) with OPDIVO + CABOMETYX vs 8.4 (95% CI: 7.0–9.7) with sunitinib (HR=0.58; 95% CI: 0.49–0.70)3

Overall response rate

  • ORR†‡: 55.7% (n=180/323 [95% CI: 50.1–61.2]) with OPDIVO + CABOMETYX vs 27.7% (n=91/328 [95% CI: 23.0–32.9]) with sunitinib3
    • 13.6% (n=44/323) CR and 42.1% (n=136/323) PR with OPDIVO + CABOMETYX vs 4.6% (n=15/328) CR and 23.2% (n=76/328) PR with sunitinib3

Overall survival

  • mOS: 46.5 months (95% CI: 40.6–53.4) with OPDIVO + CABOMETYX and 36.0 months (95% CI: 29.2–42.8) with sunitinib (HR=0.77; 95% CI: 0.63–0.95)3

*Based on primary analysis at a median follow-up time of 18.1 months (range: 10.6–30.6 months).4
BICR assessed.1,3  
Based on extended follow-up analysis at a minimum follow-up time of 48.1 months.3

BICR=blinded independent central review; CI=confidence interval; CR=complete response; HR=hazard ratio; mOS=median overall survival; mPFS=median progression-free survival; NE=not evaluable; NR=not reached; ORR=overall response rate; OS=overall survival; PFS=progression-free survival; PR=partial response.

Select Important Safety Information
Serious Adverse Reactions

In Checkmate 9ER, serious adverse reactions occurred in 48% of patients receiving OPDIVO and cabozantinib (n=320). The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients were diarrhea, pneumonia, pneumonitis, pulmonary embolism, urinary tract infection, and hyponatremia. Fatal intestinal perforations occurred in 3 (0.9%) patients.

Common Adverse Reactions

In Checkmate 9ER, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) in patients receiving OPDIVO and cabozantinib (n=320) were diarrhea (64%), fatigue (51%), hepatotoxicity (44%), palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome (40%), stomatitis (37%), rash (36%), hypertension (36%), hypothyroidism (34%), musculoskeletal pain (33%), decreased appetite (28%), nausea (27%), dysgeusia (24%), abdominal pain (22%), upper respiratory tract infection (20%), and cough (20%).

Please see additional Important Safety Information below and U.S. Full Prescribing Information for OPDIVO.

OPDIVO + CABOMETYX was studied in a phase 3, head-to-head trial vs sunitinib1,3,4

CHECKMATE 9ER: OPDIVO + CABOMETYX IN aRCC1,3
Checkmate 9ER Study Design in aRCC

Checkmate 9ER includes data from an extended follow-up analysis at a minimum follow-up time of 48.1 months3

  • Median follow-up time of the primary analysis was 18.1 months (range: 10.6–30.6 months)4
  • Patients with autoimmune disease or other medical conditions requiring systemic immunosuppression were excluded from the trial1
  • OPDIVO dosing was not to exceed a total of 2 years (from Cycle 1); CABOMETYX and sunitinib treatment was allowed to continue beyond 2 years in the absence of progression or unacceptable toxicity1,4
  • Treatment beyond RECIST-defined disease progression was permitted if the patient was clinically stable and considered to be deriving clinical benefit by the investigator1
  • Tumor assessments were performed at baseline, after randomization at Week 12, then every 6 weeks until Week 60, and then every 12 weeks thereafter1

*Defined as the percent of positive tumor cell membrane staining in a minimum of 100 evaluable tumor cells per validated Dako PD-L1 immunohistochemistry 28-8 pharmDx assay.4
Approved dosing: OPDIVO 240 mg IV q2w or OPDIVO 480 mg IV q4w, in combination with CABOMETYX 40 mg PO qd without food. Continue OPDIVO until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or up to 2 years. Continue CABOMETYX until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.1
BICR assessed.4
IMDC=International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium; IV=intravenous; PD-L1=programmed death-ligand 1; PO=orally; q2w=every 2 weeks; q4w=every 4 weeks; qd=every day; RECIST=Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.

Checkmate 9ER baseline characteristics1,4,5

BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS OPDIVO + CABOMETYX (n=323) SUNITINIB (n=328)
Median age (range), years 61 (28–90) 61 (28–86)
Male, % 74 71
IMDC prognostic score, % 
Favorable (0) 
Intermediate (1-2) 
Poor (3–5)

22 
58 
20

22 
57 
21
Prior nephrectomy, % 69 71
Tumor PD-L1 expression,
≥1% 
<1% or indeterminate

26 
74

25 
75
Region, % 
US/Canada/Western Europe/ 
Northern Europe 
Rest of the world


49 
51


49 
51
Number of sites with target/ 
non-target lesions
, % 

≥2


20 
80


21 
78
Most common site of metastasis, % 
Lung 
Lymph node 
Bone 
Liver

 

74 
40 
24 
23

 

76 
40 
22 
16

IMDC risk stratification is reflective of the real world6

IMDC risk, PD-L1 status, and region (stratification factors) were recorded at screening using interactive response technology among all randomized patients.4

OPDIVO + CABOMETYX: Early and sustained separation of curves observed through 4 years1,3,4*†‡§||

PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL: EXTENDED FOLLOW-UP ANALYSIS AT 48.1 MONTHS1,3,4
Checkmate 9ER PFS data at 48.1 months follow-up, Chart

Median PFS§ at extended follow-up analysis (minimum follow-up time of 48.1 months)3

  • OPDIVO + CABOMETYX: 16.4 months (95% CI: 12.5–19.3)3

  • Sunitinib: 8.4 months (95% CI: 7.0–9.7)3

  • HR=0.58 (95% CI: 0.49–0.70)3

*Based on extended follow-up analysis at a minimum follow-up time of 48.1 months.3
Vs sunitinib in the ITT population.1
Based on primary analysis results at a median follow-up of 18.1 months (10.6–30.6 months).4
§BICR assessed.1,3
||This statement is observational and was not powered to detect differences in the treatment effect.

OPDIVO + CABOMETYX: ORR vs a TKI monotherapy1,3,4*†‡

image 9er checkmark orr

Primary analysis ORR§ (median follow-up time of 18.1 months; range: 10.6–30.6 months): 55.7% (n=180/323 [95% CI: 50.1–61.2]) with OPDIVO + CABOMETYX vs 27.1% (n=89/328 [95% CI: 22.4–32.3]) with sunitinib; P<0.00011,4

  • 8% (n=26/323) CR and 48% (n=154/323) PR with OPDIVO + CABOMETYX vs 4.6% (n=15/328) CR and 23% (n=74/328) PR with sunitinib1,4
OVERALL RESPONSE RATE: EXTENDED FOLLOW-UP ANALYSIS AT 48.1 MONTHS3
Checkmate 9ER ORR 48.1 months follow-up Analysis, Chart

OPDIVO + CABOMETYX: ~90% DCR3*

  • The FDA does not consider SD to be a valid endpoint for the measurement of response because it may reflect the natural history of disease rather than any effect of the drug7
  • DCR was not pre-specified1

ORR§ at extended follow-up analysis (minimum follow-up time of 48.1 months)3

  • 55.7% (n=180/323 [95% CI: 50.1–61.2]) with OPDIVO + CABOMETYX vs 27.7% (n=91/328 [95% CI: 23.0–32.9]) with sunitinib3*
    • 13.6% (n=44/323) CR and 42.1% (n=136/323) PR with OPDIVO + CABOMETYX vs 4.6% (n=15/328) CR and 23.2% (n=76/328) PR with sunitinib3

*Based on extended follow-up analysis at minimum follow-up time of 48.1 months.3
Vs sunitinib in the ITT population.1
Based on primary analysis at a median follow-up time of 18.1 months (range: 10.6–30.6 months).4
§BICR assessed.1,3

DCR=disease control rate; SD=stable disease.

OPDIVO + CABOMETYX: Nearly 3x more complete responses at 4 years1,3,4*

OPDIVO + CABOMETYX RESPONSE DATA AT 4 YEARS
Checkmate 9ER response data at 4 years

ORR at primary analysis (median follow-up time of 18.1 months [range: 10.6–30.6])1,4

  • 55.7% (n=180/323 [95% CI: 50.1–61.2]) with OPDIVO + CABOMETYX vs 27.1% (n=89/328 [95% CI: 22.4–32.3]) with sunitinib (P<0.0001)1,4
  • 8% (n=26/323) CR and 48% (n=154/323) PR with OPDIVO + CABOMETYX vs 4.6% (n=15/328) CR and 23% (n=74/328) PR for sunitinib1,4

ORR at extended follow-up analysis (minimum follow-up time of 48.1 months)3

  • 55.7% (n=180/323 [95% CI: 50.1–61.2]) with OPDIVO + CABOMETYX vs 27.7% (n=91/328 [95% CI: 23.0–32.9]) with sunitinib (P<0.0001)3
  • 13.6% (n=44/323) CR and 42.1% (n=136/323) PR with OPDIVO + CABOMETYX vs 4.6% (n=15/328) CR and 23.2% (n=76/328) PR for sunitinib3

*Vs sunitinib.3

OPDIVO + CABOMETYX: OS vs a TKI monotherapy1,3*†‡

OS: 48.9% OF PATIENTS WERE STILL ALIVE AT 4 YEARS WITH OPDIVO + CABOMETYX3†‡

OVERALL SURVIVAL: EXTENDED FOLLOW-UP ANALYSIS AT 48.1 MONTHS1,3,4*
Checkmate 9ER OS data at 48.1 months, chart

Median OS at extended follow-up analysis (minimum follow-up time of 48.1 months)3

  • OPDIVO + CABOMETYX: 46.5 months (95% CI: 40.6–53.4)3
  • Sunitinib: 36.0 months (95% CI: 29.2–42.8)3
  • HR=0.77 (95% CI: 0.63–0.95)3

*Based on extended follow-up analysis at a minimum follow-up time of 48.1 months.3
Vs sunitinib in the ITT population.1
Based on primary analysis at a median follow-up time of 18.1 months (range: 10.6–30.6 months).4

OPDIVO + CABOMETYX: Flexible dosing options and a once-daily TKI1

OPDIVO® (nivolumab) + CABOMETYX®(cabozantinib) Dosing Options for aRCC

 

  • Based on exploratory dose exposure-response relationships for efficacy and safety, OPDIVO 240 mg q2w and 480 mg q4w are predicted to be similar8
  • In combination with OPDIVO, the recommended combination-specific starting dose for CABOMETYX is 40 mg. In Checkmate 9ER, CABOMETYX could be interrupted or reduced to 20 mg daily or 20 mg every other day1
  • Review the Full Prescribing Information for both OPDIVO and CABOMETYX prior to initiation, including recommended dosage and dose modifications1
  • No premedication required with OPDIVO + CABOMETYX1

*OPDIVO is administered as an IV infusion over 30 minutes.1

Bar graph with magnifying glass icon
Safety Data

View a selected safety profile of adverse reactions seen in clinical trials.

OPDIVO® (nivolumab) vial with timer icon
Dosing Schedules

Find dosing information to get patients started on therapy. 

Kidney icon
Another Advanced RCC Option

Learn more about another OPDIVO-based combination for advanced renal cell carcinoma.

References:

  1. OPDIVO [package insert]. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.
  2. CABOMETYX [package insert]. Alameda, CA: Exelixis, Inc.
  3. Bourlon MT, Escudier B, Burotto M, et al. Nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib for previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma: results from 55-month followup of the CheckMate 9ER trial. Oral presentation at ASCO GU 2024. Abstract 362.
  4. Choueiri TK, Powles T, Burotto M, et al. Nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib in first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: first results from the randomized phase 3 CheckMate 9ER trial. Slide presentation at ESMO 2020. Presentation 6960. 
  5. Motzer RJ, Choueiri TK, Powles T, et al. Nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib for advanced renal cell carcinoma: outcomes by sarcomatoid histology and updated trial results with extended follow-up of CheckMate 9ER. Poster presentation at ASCO GU 2021. Abstract 308.
  6. Heng DY, Xie W, Regan MM, et al. External validation and comparison with other models of the International Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium prognostic model: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(2):141-148.
  7. US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). Published December 2018. Accessed December 21, 2020. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/clinical-trial-endpoints-approval-cancer-drugs-and-biologics.
  8. Long GV, Tykodi SS, Schneider JG, et al. Assessment of nivolumab exposure and clinical safety of 480 mg every 4 weeks flat-dosing schedule in patients with cancer. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(11):2208-2213.


466-US-2400254   10/24