ALL RANDOMIZED | OPDIVO + YERVOY (n=335) | LEN/SOR* (n=333) |
---|---|---|
Median age (range), years | 65 (20–86) | 66 (20–89) |
Male | 271 (81) | 277 (83) |
Region Asia Non-Asia† |
133 (40) 202 (60) |
147 (44) 186 (56) |
Etiology‡ HBV HCV Uninfected |
114 (34) 90 (27) 124 (37) |
115 (35) 96 (29) 119 (36) |
Child-Pugh score§ 5 6 ≥7II |
254 (76) 72 (21) 9 (3) |
263 (79) 58 (17) 11 (3) |
ECOG PS¶ 0 1 |
233 (70) 102 (30) |
243 (73) 89 (27) |
BCLC stage# ≤B C |
89 (27) 246 (73) |
88 (26) 242 (73) |
MVI/EHS Vascular invasion Extrahepatic spread |
221 (66) 77 (23) 188 (56) |
217 (65) 92 (28) 172 (52) |
Alpha-fetoprotein <400 ng/ml ≥400 ng/ml |
227 (68) 108 (32) |
220 (66) 113 (34) |
Prior local therapy | 142 (42) | 158 (47) |
For the treatment of 1L unresectable or metastatic HCC
Now FDA Approved
When your patients have
milestones in mind,
Extend the possibilities of durable survival with OPDIVO + YERVOY1,2*
38% of patients alive at 3 years†
*In Checkmate 9DW, mOS with OPDIVO + YERVOY (n=335) was 23.7 mos (95% CI: 18.8–29.4) vs 20.6 mos (95% CI: 17.5–22.5) with investigator's choice of lenvatinib/sorafenib (n=333); HR=0.79 (95% CI: 0.65–0.96); P=0.0180.2
†vs 24% of patients alive at 3 years with investigator's choice of lenvatinib/sorafenib.1
Actor portrayal.
INDICATION OPDIVO® (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY® (ipilimumab), is indicated for the first-line treatment of adult patients with unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
CHECKMATE 9DW: 1L TREATMENT OF ADULT PATIENTS WITH UNRESECTABLE OR METASTATIC HCC
The only FDA-approved treatment to show positive results vs investigator’s choice of lenvatinib or sorafenib1,2*†
Checkmate 9DW was a global, phase 3, randomized, open-label trial1
STUDY DESIGN1-4
- Treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent (all arms), or a maximum treatment duration of 2 years (OPDIVO + YERVOY arm only)1
- Patients were not required to have an EGD in Checkmate 9DW2
- At the data cutoff (1/31/24), the median follow-up was 35.2 months (range: 26.8–48.9)3‡‡
85% of patients in the comparator arm were treated with lenvatinib2
*Positive results inclusive of OS and ORR.2 †Study was not designed to independently compare OPDIVO + YERVOY vs lenvatinib or OPDIVO + YERVOY vs sorafenib. ‡Disease not eligible for, or progressive disease after, curative surgical and/or locoregional therapies.1 §Based on central lab serology results for stratification purpose.3 ‖Minimum of 1 dose of OPDIVO + YERVOY is required before proceeding to OPDIVO monotherapy.1 ¶If body weight <60 kg.2 #If body weight ≥60 kg.2 **Among 325 patients treated with lenvatinib/sorafenib: 275 (85%) received lenvatinib and 50 (15%) received sorafenib.1 ††Based on HCS score of the FACT-Hep.1 ‡‡Time between randomization date and cutoff date.3
1L=first-line; AFP=alpha-fetoprotein; BICR=blinded independent central review; BID=twice daily; CI=confidence interval; DOR=duration of response; ECOG PS=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status; EGD=esophagogastroduodenoscopy; EHS=extrahepatic spread; FACT-Hep=Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatic; HBV=hepatitis B virus; HCC=hepatocellular carcinoma; HCS=hepatobiliary cancer subscale; HCV=hepatitis C virus; HR=hazard ratio; HRQOL=health-related quality of life; IV=intravenous; mos=months; mOS=median overall survival; MVI=macroscopic vascular invasion; ORR=overall response rate; OS=overall survival; PFS=progression-free survival; po=orally; q3w=every 3 weeks; q4w=every 4 weeks; qd=every day; R=randomized; RECIST=Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; TTR=time to response.
Durable survival and deeper responses with OPDIVO + YERVOY1,2*†
*vs investigator’s choice of lenvatinib/sorafenib.2 †Study was not designed to independently compare OPDIVO + YERVOY vs lenvatinib or OPDIVO + YERVOY vs sorafenib. ‡Investigator’s choice.2 §Two-sided P value from stratified log-rank test. Boundary for statistical significance: P≤0.0257.2 ‖Responses achieved in ORR and DOR assessed by BICR based on RECIST v1.1.2 ¶ORR includes CR (7% vs 2%) and PR (29% vs 11%).2 #Two-sided P value from stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. Boundary for statistical significance: P≤0.025.2 **DOR is not included in the statistical hierarchical testing, and therefore is not a powered endpoint. ††Number of confirmed responders.2
CR=complete response; NR=not reached; PR=partial response.
Select Important Safety Information
Serious Adverse Reactions
In Checkmate 9DW, serious adverse reactions occurred in 53% of patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY (n=332). The most frequent non liver-related serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients who received OPDIVO with YERVOY were diarrhea/colitis (4.5%), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (3%), and rash (2.4%). Liver-related serious adverse reactions occurred in 17% of patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY, including Grade 3-4 events in 16% of patients. The most frequently reported all grade liver-related serious adverse reactions occurring in ≥1% of patients who received OPDIVO with YERVOY were immune-mediated hepatitis (3%), increased AST/ALT (3%), hepatic failure (2.4%), ascites (2.4%), and hepatotoxicity (1.2%). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 12 (3.6%) patients who received OPDIVO with YERVOY; these included 4 (1.2%) patients who died due to immune-mediated or autoimmune hepatitis and 4 (1.2%) patients who died of hepatic failure.
Common Adverse Reactions
In Checkmate 9DW, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) in patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY (n=332) were rash (36%), pruritus (34%), fatigue (33%), and diarrhea (25%).
Please see additional Important Safety Information below.
Durable survival with OPDIVO + YERVOY1,2*†
38% of patients alive at 3 years1‡
OVERALL SURVIVAL (OS)1,2
Median follow-up: 35.2 months (range: 26.8–48.9).1,2
*mOS of 23.7 mos vs 20.6 mos with investigator's choice of lenvatinib/sorafenib; HR=0.79 (95% CI: 0.65–0.96); P=0.0180.2 †Study was not designed to independently compare OPDIVO + YERVOY vs lenvatinib or OPDIVO + YERVOY vs sorafenib. ‡vs investigator's choice of lenvatinib/sorafenib.2 §Median OS is estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. HR and 95% CI from stratified Cox proportional hazard model. HR is OPDIVO + YERVOY vs lenvatinib/sorafenib.3 IIInvestigator’s choice.2 ¶Two-sided P value from stratified log-rank test. Boundary for statistical significance: P≤0.0257.3
Deeper response with OPDIVO + YERVOY2*†
36% of patients achieved a response vs 13% with lenvatinib or sorafenib‡
OVERALL RESPONSE RATE (ORR) (SECONDARY ENDPOINT)§
- OPDIVO + YERVOY demonstrated a statistically significant improvement (P<0.0001) in ORR vs lenvatinib or sorafenib3‡
- Median TTR (exploratory analysis) was 2.2 months for OPDIVO + YERVOY (range: 1.1–11.6) and 3.7 months (range: 0.6–11.2) for lenvatinib or sorafenib1‡¶
*vs investigator’s choice of lenvatinib/sorafenib.2 †Study was not designed to independently compare OPDIVO + YERVOY vs lenvatinib or OPDIVO + YERVOY vs sorafenib. ‡Investigator’s choice.2 §ORR was a secondary endpoint in Checkmate 9DW; assessed by BICR based on RECIST v1.1.1,2 ‖Two-sided P value from stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. Boundary for statistical significance: P≤0.025.2 ¶Median TTR in confirmed responders (OPDIVO + YERVOY: n=121; lenvatinib/sorafenib: n=44).1
Longer responses with OPDIVO + YERVOY1-3,5*†
Responses lasting more than twice as long*
DURATION OF RESPONSE (DOR)
Median follow-up: 35.2 months (range: 26.8–48.9).1,3
*vs investigator’s choice of lenvatinib/sorafenib.2 †Study was not designed to independently compare OPDIVO + YERVOY vs lenvatinib or OPDIVO + YERVOY vs sorafenib. ‡DOR is not included in the statistical hierarchical testing and therefore is not a powered endpoint. DOR was a secondary endpoint in Checkmate 9DW; assessed by BICR per RECIST v1.1.1 Duration of response (DOR) is not included in the statistical hierarchical testing, and therefore is not a powered endpoint. §Investigator’s choice.2 ‖Number of confirmed responders.1,2
Baseline characteristics1,6
Data shown as n (%) unless otherwise noted.
*Investigator’s choice.2 †Included Europe, North America, and the rest of the world.1 ‡HBV and HCV categories include both subjects with active and past/resolved infection. Seven patients in the OPDIVO + YERVOY arm and 3 patients in the lenvatinib/sorafenib arm were reported as having both HBV and HCV as risk factors for HCC; these patients did not have active co-infection with HBV and HCV.3 §Score 8: OPDIVO + YERVOY, n=1.6 Score not reported: lenvatinib/sorafenib, n=1.1 IIThese patients represent protocol deviations and those who advanced to a Child-Pugh score of 7 at the time of first dose.1 ¶Not reported: lenvatinib/sorafenib, n=1.1 #Unknown: lenvatinib/sorafenib, n=3.1
BCLC=Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; LEN=lenvatinib; SOR=sorafenib.
Up to 4 induction doses with OPDIVO + YERVOY, followed by maintenance with OPDIVO monotherapy2
- In Checkmate 9DW, patients who discontinued combination therapy because of an adverse reaction attributed to YERVOY were permitted to continue OPDIVO as a single agent2‡
*OPDIVO is administered as a 30-minute IV infusion in both the induction and maintenance phases.2 †YERVOY is administered as a 30-minute IV infusion following OPDIVO IV over 30 minutes on the same day.2,7 ‡Minimum of 1 dose of OPDIVO + YERVOY is required before proceeding to OPDIVO monotherapy.1
Safety Data
View a selected safety profile of adverse reactions seen in clinical trials.
Dosing Schedule
Find dosing information to get patients started on therapy.
HCP & Patient Resources
Find useful resources for both you and your patients from the first dose forward.
References:
- Kudo M, Yau T, Decaens T, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs lenvatinib or sorafenib as first-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: CheckMate 9DW expanded analyses. Oral presentation at ASCO-GI 2025. Abstract 520.
- OPDIVO [package insert]. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.
- Galle PR, Decaens T, Kudo M, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs lenvatinib or sorafenib as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: first results from CheckMate 9DW. Oral presentation at ASCO 2024. Abstract LBA4008.
- Data on file. BMS-REF-NIVO-0335. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2025.
- Data on file. BMS-REF-NIVO-0326. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2025.
- Decaens T, Yau T, Kudo M, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs lenvatinib or sorafenib as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: expanded analyses from CheckMate 9DW. Oral presentation at ESMO 2024. Abstract 965MO.
- YERVOY [package insert]. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.