For the treatment of 1L unresectable or metastatic HCC

Now FDA Approved

OPDIVO® (nivolumab) + YERVOY® (ipilimumab) logo

When your patients have
milestones in mind,

Extend the possibilities of durable survival with OPDIVO + YERVOY1,2*

38% of patients alive at 3 years

*In Checkmate 9DW, mOS with OPDIVO + YERVOY (n=335) was 23.7 mos (95% CI: 18.8–29.4) vs 20.6 mos (95% CI: 17.5–22.5) with investigator's choice of lenvatinib/sorafenib (n=333); HR=0.79 (95% CI: 0.65–0.96); P=0.0180.2

vs 24% of patients alive at 3 years with investigator's choice of lenvatinib/sorafenib.1

Actor portrayal.

INDICATION OPDIVO® (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY® (ipilimumab), is indicated for the first-line treatment of adult patients with unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

CHECKMATE 9DW: 1L TREATMENT OF ADULT PATIENTS WITH UNRESECTABLE OR METASTATIC HCC

The only FDA-approved treatment to show positive results vs investigator’s choice of lenvatinib or sorafenib1,2*

Checkmate 9DW was a global, phase 3, randomized, open-label trial1
STUDY DESIGN1-4
Checkmate 9DW study design, graphic
  • Treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent (all arms), or a maximum treatment duration of 2 years (OPDIVO + YERVOY arm only)1
  • Patients were not required to have an EGD in Checkmate 9DW2
  • At the data cutoff (1/31/24), the median follow-up was 35.2 months (range: 26.8–48.9)3‡‡

85% of patients in the comparator arm were treated with lenvatinib2

*Positive results inclusive of OS and ORR.2 Study was not designed to independently compare OPDIVO + YERVOY vs lenvatinib or OPDIVO + YERVOY vs sorafenib. Disease not eligible for, or progressive disease after, curative surgical and/or locoregional therapies.1 §Based on central lab serology results for stratification purpose.3 Minimum of 1 dose of OPDIVO + YERVOY is required before proceeding to OPDIVO monotherapy.1 If body weight <60 kg.2 #If body weight ≥60 kg.2 **Among 325 patients treated with lenvatinib/sorafenib: 275 (85%) received lenvatinib and 50 (15%) received sorafenib.1 ††Based on HCS score of the FACT-Hep.1 ‡‡Time between randomization date and cutoff date.3

1L=first-line; AFP=alpha-fetoprotein; BICR=blinded independent central review; BID=twice daily; CI=confidence interval; DOR=duration of response; ECOG PS=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status; EGD=esophagogastroduodenoscopy; EHS=extrahepatic spread; FACT-Hep=Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatic; HBV=hepatitis B virus; HCC=hepatocellular carcinoma; HCS=hepatobiliary cancer subscale; HCV=hepatitis C virus; HR=hazard ratio; HRQOL=health-related quality of life; IV=intravenous; mos=months; mOS=median overall survival; MVI=macroscopic vascular invasion; ORR=overall response rate; OS=overall survival; PFS=progression-free survival; po=orally; q3w=every 3 weeks; q4w=every 4 weeks; qd=every day; R=randomized; RECIST=Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; TTR=time to response.

Durable survival and deeper responses with OPDIVO + YERVOY1,2*

Overall Survival (OS) at 3 years and Overall Response Rate (ORR)  OPDIVO® + YERVOY® in Checkmate 9DW

*vs investigator’s choice of lenvatinib/sorafenib.2 Study was not designed to independently compare OPDIVO + YERVOY vs lenvatinib or OPDIVO + YERVOY vs sorafenib. Investigator’s choice.2 §Two-sided P value from stratified log-rank test. Boundary for statistical significance: P≤0.0257.2 Responses achieved in ORR and DOR assessed by BICR based on RECIST v1.1.2 ORR includes CR (7% vs 2%) and PR (29% vs 11%).2 #Two-sided P value from stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. Boundary for statistical significance: P≤0.025.2 **DOR is not included in the statistical hierarchical testing, and therefore is not a powered endpoint. ††Number of confirmed responders.2

CR=complete response; NR=not reached; PR=partial response.

Select Important Safety Information

Serious Adverse Reactions

In Checkmate 9DW, serious adverse reactions occurred in 53% of patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY (n=332). The most frequent non liver-related serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients who received OPDIVO with YERVOY were diarrhea/colitis (4.5%), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (3%), and rash (2.4%). Liver-related serious adverse reactions occurred in 17% of patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY, including Grade 3-4 events in 16% of patients. The most frequently reported all grade liver-related serious adverse reactions occurring in ≥1% of patients who received OPDIVO with YERVOY were immune-mediated hepatitis (3%), increased AST/ALT (3%), hepatic failure (2.4%), ascites (2.4%), and hepatotoxicity (1.2%). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 12 (3.6%) patients who received OPDIVO with YERVOY; these included 4 (1.2%) patients who died due to immune-mediated or autoimmune hepatitis and 4 (1.2%) patients who died of hepatic failure.

Common Adverse Reactions

In Checkmate 9DW, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) in patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY (n=332) were rash (36%), pruritus (34%), fatigue (33%), and diarrhea (25%).

Please see additional Important Safety Information below.

Durable survival with OPDIVO + YERVOY1,2*

38% of patients alive at 3 years1‡

OVERALL SURVIVAL (OS)1,2
Overall Survival (OS) at 3 years OPDIVO® + YERVOY® in Checkmate 9DW, Kaplan-Meier Curve

Median follow-up: 35.2 months (range: 26.8–48.9).1,2

*mOS of 23.7 mos vs 20.6 mos with investigator's choice of lenvatinib/sorafenib; HR=0.79 (95% CI: 0.65–0.96); P=0.0180.2 Study was not designed to independently compare OPDIVO + YERVOY vs lenvatinib or OPDIVO + YERVOY vs sorafenib. vs investigator's choice of lenvatinib/sorafenib.2 §Median OS is estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. HR and 95% CI from stratified Cox proportional hazard model. HR is OPDIVO + YERVOY vs lenvatinib/sorafenib.3 IIInvestigator’s choice.2 Two-sided P value from stratified log-rank test. Boundary for statistical significance: P≤0.0257.3

Deeper response with OPDIVO + YERVOY2*

36% of patients achieved a response vs 13% with lenvatinib or sorafenib

OVERALL RESPONSE RATE (ORR) (SECONDARY ENDPOINT)§
Overall Response Rate (ORR)  OPDIVO® + YERVOY® in Checkmate 9DW, graphic
  • OPDIVO + YERVOY demonstrated a statistically significant improvement (P<0.0001) in ORR vs lenvatinib or sorafenib3‡
  • Median TTR (exploratory analysis) was 2.2 months for OPDIVO + YERVOY (range: 1.1–11.6) and 3.7 months (range: 0.6–11.2) for lenvatinib or sorafenib1‡¶

*vs investigator’s choice of lenvatinib/sorafenib.2 Study was not designed to independently compare OPDIVO + YERVOY vs lenvatinib or OPDIVO + YERVOY vs sorafenib. Investigator’s choice.2 §ORR was a secondary endpoint in Checkmate 9DW; assessed by BICR based on RECIST v1.1.1,2 Two-sided P value from stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. Boundary for statistical significance: P≤0.025.2 Median TTR in confirmed responders (OPDIVO + YERVOY: n=121; lenvatinib/sorafenib: n=44).1

Longer responses with OPDIVO + YERVOY1-3,5*

Responses lasting more than twice as long*

DURATION OF RESPONSE (DOR)
Median Duration of Response (DOR) OPDIVO® + YERVOY® in Checkmate  9DW, Kaplan-Meier Curve

Median follow-up: 35.2 months (range: 26.8–48.9).1,3

*vs investigator’s choice of lenvatinib/sorafenib.2 Study was not designed to independently compare OPDIVO + YERVOY vs lenvatinib or OPDIVO + YERVOY vs sorafenib. DOR is not included in the statistical hierarchical testing and therefore is not a powered endpoint. DOR was a secondary endpoint in Checkmate 9DW; assessed by BICR per RECIST v1.1.1 Duration of response (DOR) is not included in the statistical hierarchical testing, and therefore is not a powered endpoint. §Investigator’s choice.2 Number of confirmed responders.1,2

Baseline characteristics1,6

ALL RANDOMIZED OPDIVO + YERVOY (n=335) LEN/SOR* (n=333)
Median age (range), years 65 (20–86) 66 (20–89)
Male 271 (81) 277 (83)
Region
Asia
Non-Asia

133 (40)
202 (60)

147 (44)
186 (56)
Etiology
HBV
HCV
Uninfected

114 (34)
90 (27)
124 (37)

115 (35)
96 (29)
119 (36)
Child-Pugh score§
5
6
≥7II

254 (76)
72 (21)
9 (3)

263 (79)
58 (17)
11 (3)
ECOG PS
0
1

233 (70)
102 (30)

243 (73)
89 (27)
BCLC stage# 
≤B
C

89 (27)
246 (73)

88 (26)
242 (73)
MVI/EHS
Vascular invasion
Extrahepatic spread

221 (66)
77 (23)
188 (56)

217 (65)
92 (28)
172 (52)
Alpha-fetoprotein
<400 ng/ml
≥400 ng/ml

227 (68)
108 (32)

220 (66)
113 (34)
Prior local therapy 142 (42) 158 (47)

Data shown as n (%) unless otherwise noted.

*Investigator’s choice.2 Included Europe, North America, and the rest of the world.1 HBV and HCV categories include both subjects with active and past/resolved infection. Seven patients in the OPDIVO + YERVOY arm and 3 patients in the lenvatinib/sorafenib arm were reported as having both HBV and HCV as risk factors for HCC; these patients did not have active co-infection with HBV and HCV.3 §Score 8: OPDIVO + YERVOY, n=1.6 Score not reported: lenvatinib/sorafenib, n=1.1 IIThese patients represent protocol deviations and those who advanced to a Child-Pugh score of 7 at the time of first dose.1 Not reported: lenvatinib/sorafenib, n=1.1 #Unknown: lenvatinib/sorafenib, n=3.1

BCLC=Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; LEN=lenvatinib; SOR=sorafenib.

Up to 4 induction doses with OPDIVO + YERVOY, followed by maintenance with OPDIVO monotherapy2

OPDIVO® (nivolumab) + YERVOY® (ipilimumab) Induction & Maintenance Dosing Schedule
  • In Checkmate 9DW, patients who discontinued combination therapy because of an adverse reaction attributed to YERVOY were permitted to continue OPDIVO as a single agent2‡

*OPDIVO is administered as a 30-minute IV infusion in both the induction and maintenance phases.2 YERVOY is administered as a 30-minute IV infusion following OPDIVO IV over 30 minutes on the same day.2,7 Minimum of 1 dose of OPDIVO + YERVOY is required before proceeding to OPDIVO monotherapy.1

Bar graph with magnifying glass icon
Safety Data

View a selected safety profile of adverse reactions seen in clinical trials.

OPDIVO® (nivolumab) vial with timer icon
Dosing Schedule

Find dosing information to get patients started on therapy. 

Phone, tablet and computer icon
HCP & Patient Resources

Find useful resources for both you and your patients from the first dose forward.

References:

  1. Kudo M, Yau T, Decaens T, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs lenvatinib or sorafenib as first-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: CheckMate 9DW expanded analyses. Oral presentation at ASCO-GI 2025. Abstract 520.
  2. OPDIVO [package insert]. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.
  3. Galle PR, Decaens T, Kudo M, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs lenvatinib or sorafenib as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: first results from CheckMate 9DW. Oral presentation at ASCO 2024. Abstract LBA4008.
  4. Data on file. BMS-REF-NIVO-0335. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2025.
  5. Data on file. BMS-REF-NIVO-0326. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2025.
  6. Decaens T, Yau T, Kudo M, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs lenvatinib or sorafenib as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: expanded analyses from CheckMate 9DW. Oral presentation at ESMO 2024. Abstract 965MO.
  7. YERVOY [package insert]. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.


7356-US-2500039   04/25